Science Frontiers ONLINE No. 34: Jul-Aug 1984 | |
|
The following letter was received in response to an item in SF#32. Since it contains much information, we decided to reprint it with the writer's permission.
"I am writing to mildly protest the substance and style of your article 'Two Remarkable Inscribed Stones.' Of course substance and style are interrelated, but I'll try to separate them as best I can. First, let me address style. The condescending 'fragile hypothesis treatment' ('... which in his view...' 'Fell, however, considers them...' '...Comparisons... suggest...') is totally inappropriate when one considers the mathematical probabilities of thousands of petroglyphs possessing markings coincidently identical to those of ancient languages of the Old World. And one has to marvel at the cutting power and linguistic talent of certain plows."In the substance area vis-a-vis the alleged absence of artifacts: While it wouldn't be fair to expect the author to have been familiar with Professor Fell's three books on the subject, and the previous volumes of the ESOP, with their many references to artifacts (loomweights, amphorettas, Roman lamps, countless Roman and other coins, and various other Old World items) it would not seem unreasonable to expect the author to have been familiar with the articles about Roman artifacts in the same volume he extracted portions from. Concerning the glib question about '...what these old explorers or colonists did except carve symbols on rocks.' It's instructive to remember that while many Old World artifacts have been found, many artifacts were of a biodegradable nature -- wood, leather, fabric, etc. But perhaps the most cogent remnants of Old World visitors can be found in the numerous Indian languages which still use Old World alphabets and vocabularies."
(Radloff, David M.; private communication, April 16, 1984.)
Comment. Radloff is an Associate Editor of the Epigraphic Society. In a separate communication, Barry Fell concurred with Radloff's comments, adding that while the American archeological establishment ignores Old World artifacts in North America, European and North African journals do report them.